About three thousand
years ago, David and Solomon ruled over Israel's golden age. After
Solomon died, his son Rehoboam continued Solomon's worst policies,
promised to raise taxes higher still. General Jeroboam led a
rebellion, and most of the tribes seceded to form the northern
kingdom, called Israel. Rehoboam was left with a couple tribes in
the south, now the country of Judah.
Nearly three centuries passed.
Israel never had a decent king, so around 722 BC, the Assyrians came
and wiped them off the face of the map, replacing many of them with
pagan settlers who intermarried with the remaining locals. Judah had
a few good kings like Hezekiah and Josiah, so God put up with them a
while longer. Around 596 BC, the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar
came and deported the best and brightest – people like Ezekiel.
Ten more years passed, and Nebuchadnezzar came back, ended the
kingdom of Judah, demolished Solomon's Temple and the city of
Jerusalem, and took many more of the people into exile.
Decades went by, and we
read plenty about it in the book of Daniel. Jeremiah warned the
exiles to put down roots and get used to living in Babylon, because
they'd be there for a while. In time, though, the Persians conquered
Babylon – that was 539 BC. Cyrus the Great was on the throne –
Cyrus, a king Isaiah foresaw and liked enough to call him “Messiah.”
Within a year or so, Cyrus gives an Edict of Restoration: whoever
you are, if the Babylonians kidnapped you or your parents, you're
welcome to go back home; we'll help send you along, even pay costs
for rebuilding. During this time, many Jews leave Babylon to go back
home. They restore worship, and
around 535 BC they lay the foundation for the temple. But opposition
stops them.
Cyrus
dies five years later. His son Cambyses rules for eight years.
After a confusing fraudster takes power for a few months, Cambyses'
third cousin Darius overthrows that guy and takes the throne, late in
522 BC. Darius divides the kingdom into not just satrapies but
provinces. And the area around Jerusalem becomes Yehud
Medin'ta, the “province of
Judah,” within the satrapy of Eber-Nari, “Beyond the River.”
Yehud needs a governor, and who better than Zerubbabel – a Jewish
prince, grandson of the last king, who had already helped lead the
Jews back home? And yet all this time, the foundation of the temple
was just sitting there. God raises up prophets, like Haggai and
Zechariah, to challenge the people: all this time they've been
focused on their own personal homes, and they've neglected God's
temple!
So Haggai delivers his prophecy in person to Zerubbabel and
the high priest Jeshua, and they get to work. Five years later, the
Second Temple is finished and dedicated, seventy years after the
first one was destroyed. The Persians supported and funded it, just
like they did with temples elsewhere in their empire.
The
story goes silent on what happened next. After Zerubbabel,
archaeological finds tell us the names of at least three later
governors of Yehud – there was Zerubbabel's son-in-law Elnathan,
and then men named Yehoezer and Ahzai.
Meanwhile, Darius dies after
a 36-year rule, and his son Xerxes takes Persia's throne. Xerxes
leads a massive war against the Greeks, but in the Bible he's better
known for marrying a woman named Esther – a Jewish queen at the
side of Persian power, thwarting Haman's deadly plot to exterminate
the Jews. After twenty-one years, Xerxes is assassinated in the year
465 BC, and his son Artaxerxes takes the throne.
About
seven years later, as part of a policy to shore up the western
provinces to guard against the Greeks, he wants to send someone to
reinforce Jewish law in Yehud, just like Darius had equipped an
Egyptian priest named Udjahorresnet to do that in Egypt. And who
better than a brilliant scribe and priest named Ezra?
So Ezra goes
to reinforce the Law of Moses, and he brings a couple thousand more
Jews as well as extra treasure to upgrade the temple and its
services. But in the meantime, there's still opposition, and the
Persians have a heavy hand when it comes to taxes.
Around
thirteen years later, the king's cupbearer – a Jewish eunuch named
Nehemiah – dares to look sad in Artaxerxes' presence, which could
be a capital offense. He asks to go back to Jerusalem to rebuild the
wall and gates, and Artaxerxes says okay. So around 444 BC, Nehemiah
makes his trip. As the newly installed governor of Yehud, he and
some friends undertake a secret inspection of the rubble, then
address the people, propose a rebuilding project – and everyone
agrees and does it.
Not
that they had an easy time. Some villains show up in the story, most
prominently “Sanballat the Horonite” and his cronies “Tobiah
the Ammonite” and “Geshem the Arab” – all three of whom are
mentioned outside the Bible. Sanballat was the governor of Samaria.
And while his own name was pagan – it meant, “the moon god has
given life” – his sons Delaiah and Shelemiah had good Israelite
names that honored the LORD.
Sanballat was well-steeped in his people's historic rivalry with the
southern kingdom, and he didn't want to see Jerusalem thrive.
Sanballat is probably the one who built the Samaritan temple on Mount
Gerizim; and to get priests for it, married off his daughter to the
grandson of the Jewish high priest Eliashib, so that his own
grandsons would be full-fledged priests under the Law. No wonder he
was so full of schemes! He opposed everything Nehemiah did.
So did
Tobiah, the governor of the Ammonites. One wonders where he came
from: he's got a Jewish name, he married a daughter of a Jewish
leader named Shecaniah, and he married off his son Jehohanan to the
daughter of another Jewish leader named Meshullam. He gained plenty
of influence in Yehud and leveraged it to his profit. And Geshem, or
Jasuma, was an Arab chieftain who also felt threatened by what
Nehemiah and the Jews were up to.
But the people of Jerusalem
refused to let Sanballat, Tobiah, and Geshem win. With faith in God,
with vigilance, and with action, they rebuilt Jerusalem's wall and
ensured the city's survival down through history – past the Persian
era, through the days of Alexander the Great, down past the Seleucids
and the Ptolemies, to the days of Hasmoneans and Herodians and the
Holy Son of God.
That's a fine history
lesson – but what good is it today? It's been over 2400 years
since Nehemiah left the earthly scene! We're talking ancient
history. But remember: “All scripture is inspired by God” –
literally, God-breathed – “and is useful
for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient,
equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17). These books of
the Bible were relevant for the believers in Paul's day, and for
Augustine's day, and for the days of bright Constantinople, and the
days of Martin Luther, and the days of John Wesley, the days of Jacob
Albright, and the days of you and me.
What
was true for God's people then is true for God's people now. The
stories of Old Testament history, the challenges of Old Testament
prophets, haven't lost their impact. In the New Testament, two ways
the church is depicted are as a living temple and as a new Jerusalem.
What Zerubbabel, Ezra, and Nehemiah built up – well, that
foreshadows our own time.
Up 'til today, the new temple is under
construction. The Apostle Peter tells us that its stones, its
“living stones,” are people like you and me, made alive in
Christ. And they grow – the temple grows – as living stones are
added and mature, as they more and more resemble the Chief
Cornerstone who conquered the cross (1 Peter 2:4-6). Evangelism,
outreach, invitation – that's all going out to the quarry to mine
more living stones. Salvation – that's installing living stones
into the temple, a work of God. Discipleship – that's chiseling,
smoothing, expanding, beautifying living stones as they form part of
the living temple.
First
and foremost, the temple is the church universal. But these words
aren't for a church far away. They belong to Pequea just as much.
They tell our story. The words of Haggai, Ezra, Nehemiah – they
have relevance here!
Our church – yes, this church – needs to be built up. I'm not
talking about the physical building – though, come to think of it,
it ain't for nothing we take up offerings for the building fund! But
our church needs to be built up as the ministry of a living temple, a
present Zion, firm and steadfast, reaching out, calling out.
The
story of Nehemiah is for here and now. Nehemiah, when serving in
Artaxerxes' court, wept at the thought of a Jerusalem whose best days
seemed behind her. Her current state was one of decline – not as
bad as it had been in the hour of Nebuchadnezzar's power, but decline
even so. The walls were broken down; the people were poor and few;
there was rubble all over. Ask any resident of Jerusalem in the
fifth century BC when the city's glory days are – and they'll
correct you: “Were.” The glory days “were” long gone.
Jerusalem's current state isn't defensible. She's subject to the
fluctuating whims of her mightier rivals. She looks like she'll
never amount to much, never be used for great things in the service
of her God ever again. Those days are done. That's why Nehemiah's
tears drip and gush.
In hindsight, we know that's not true. We know
the greatest was yet to come, when “great David's greater Son”
appeared in the temple Zerubbabel refounded. But to Nehemiah in the
court, and to plenty of his contemporaries, it was hard not to look
back for the lost best.
Doesn't
that speak to us? The American church in general is addicted to
nostalgia, all the more now as we live increasingly in the shadows of
institutions and ideologies with greater political and cultural
clout. We see ourselves as freshly embattled; we make myths of a
golden age six decades dead.
And what of Pequea? We have to admit:
we're smaller than we once were. There was a time when this
sanctuary was nearly packed. The present decade is not that time.
We're less busy, maybe less active, than we once were. Do we even
have gates to invite our neighbors through – gates, ministries
meant to bridge the life that's in here and the need that's out
there? Or is Pequea in our day maybe a bit more like Nehemiah's time
than we'd care to admit? Yet admitting it is the first step, a step
that opens the opportunity to follow Nehemiah's example.
But
the story of Sanballat is also for here and now. Sanballat sees what
Nehemiah sees – counts the same bricks, measures the same paces,
uses the same maps, reads the same journals, attends all the same
conferences. But Sanballat doesn't see what Nehemiah sees.
Sanballat doesn't see hope – for he doesn't have faith in a living
God who loves Jerusalem. Sanballat doesn't see hope – because he
doesn't want to see hope. He wants to see failure. Sanballat is
scheming – he wants to demoralize the Jews, he wants to keep
Jerusalem out of the running, he wants to take advantage and profit
from any point of weakness. So he hatches plots, he sows doubt and
discord. He tries to challenge their loyalty: “If you commit
yourself to this project, then you're a bad Persian citizen.” He
tries to undermine their hope: “This will never work. You're too
weak. You're too few. You've got nothing to work with. It would
take more time than you've got. It will never last.” Sanballat is
the master discourager.
Can
I be honest with you? We EC pastors love to get together. We love
to talk about our churches, about what we see God doing. So I've had
many an occasion to share our statistics, to describe our church
culture, to plenty of colleagues. But a few of them – some very
esteemed and experienced church leaders – have asked me tough
questions. More than one has asked me if there's a point to me being
here – if any ministry can happen at Pequea. More than one has
feared that we're a church that's obsolete, that has no role to play
in our community, that maybe could even be called a “dying church.”
More than one has seen in us something like what Sanballat saw in
Jerusalem.
I'm
not sharing this because I want to discourage you. I'm not sharing
this because I plan to throw in the towel. I'm not sharing this
because I agree with their assessment. Just the opposite! I'm
sharing it because maybe, at some level, some in this congregation
have taken the same view of their own church – and if we have, we
need to name that, confront that, heal that.
Maybe when you form a
mental picture of a lively, busy Pequea, you feel like that thought
is just an idle daydream – fun to indulge, but not practical, not
realistic. Maybe, if you were pressed to put on paper what you
really think our
plan for the next year should be, it's all about maintenance –
keeping what we've got, gathering together with your friends for
social fellowship so we can all call ourselves Christian and feel
good about it and then go back home until next week, or some other
week if it's hunting season or football season or if we're just
hungry. Not that you'd ever say that, but it may be the unspoken
assumption in the way you view church. Anyone can fall into that
mindset. Plenty of believers do. Choir leaders do. Sunday School
teachers do. Board members do. And yes, pastors do, too.
But
I'd like to suggest that, if we buy into those assumptions, that
outlook, then we're at risk of falling under Sanballat's spell.
Sanballat says, “Once a shrinking church, always a shrinking
church.” He says, “Some churches are just unnecessary.”
Sanballat says, “There's no such thing as turnaround. Not from
this. You're too far gone.” Sanballat asks, “Why bother? Why
not be content to farm in the rubble? Isn't that a good enough life?
Don't you have better things to do?” Don't listen to Sanballat.
I
say all this to point out a sobering truth about the story we read
this morning: If the Jews had not put Nehemiah's plan into action, if
they hadn't confessed faith in a God who cherished Jerusalem and
hadn't backed up their faith with the sweat of their brow – then
Sanballat would have been right. They would not have restored
things, would not have sacrifices, would not have revived the stones
(cf. Nehemiah 4:2). Jerusalem's walls and gates would have lain in
ruins. Very possibly, invading armies, or the mere ravages of time,
would have dwindled the population to zero. And today, it would be
a dry and barren hill, loved by none but the occasional
archaeologist.
But
the Jews of Nehemiah's day weren't
content to farm in the rubble! They didn't
forever neglect their temple, their walls, their gates. They didn't
resign their city to a historical footnote. They refused to let
Sanballat win, refused to let him poison their minds or distract them
or get in their way. How on earth did they ever turn the tables on
Sanballat's sour soothsaying?
It's simple. First, there was
praying. The story makes that clear. From the beginning, before he
even left the king's court, Nehemiah fasted and prayed for days,
asking God to be attentive to “the prayer of your servants who
delight in revering your name” (Nehemiah 1:11). In the middle of
speaking to Artaxerxes, again Nehemiah “prayed to the God of
Heaven” (Nehemiah 2:4). And so his vision was shaped by God – it
was what God had put into his heart to do (Nehemiah 2:12). In the
face of Sanballat's mockery, Nehemiah prays again (Nehemiah 4:4-5).
As Sanballat schemed further, “we
prayed to our God” (Nehemiah 4:9) – not just Nehemiah, but the
whole people.
Second,
there was strategizing. Nehemiah came to Jerusalem, and he made a
survey. He didn't do it alone – he had “a few men” with him
(Nehemiah 2:12). He made a careful inspection. He assessed the
damage. And he conceived of a response. In the end, when he
enlisted support, he probably assigned tasks to each person, drawing
on what they told him of their strengths. So the whole third chapter
of his book is taken up in detailing who did what. When Sanballat's
interference complicated things, he equipped them to resist.
And
third, there was working! Nehemiah is very clear: The project succeeded
precisely because “the people had a mind to work” (Nehemiah 4:6).
Do we? Nehemiah's talking about more than a general “work ethic.”
The words of Haggai are for here and now, too. Remember, the first
resettled Jews, nearly a century before Nehemiah's time – they
worked. Sure, they worked. They worked at building nice paneled
houses for themselves, for their own comfort. Each family enjoyed
the fruit of their own soil, the shade of their own roof. But God
wasn't happy. The people built their own private dwellings, but they
neglected God's house, a house meant for everyone (Haggai 1:4). “My
house lies in ruins, while you hurry off to your own houses,” God
judged them (Haggai 1:9). Each person poured him- or herself into
shaping a new family life, grasping anxiously after the Judean Dream.
Imagine how they'd defend themselves: they've got their own fields
to till, their own time-cards to punch, their own bills to pay, their
own kids to raise. Aren't they busy enough already? Who has time
for more? Who has time to work on the temple? Their own house comes
first.
The
words of Haggai are for us here, for us now. We in America are a lot
like that generation. We have our private lives, our households to
run. Our work is all used up by our personal pet projects. Our
labor is invested in our interests; our activity is engaged by our
agendas. Our own “houses” so often come first – and so often
come last.
Now, nowhere does God condemn these Judeans merely for
having houses of their own. But when our houses get built up before
God's house, that's trouble brewing. Our problem, like the Judeans',
is that our “houses” have come unhinged from their rightful place
a few slots further down on the to-do list. They've catapulted up
the priority chain. They've become idols. Our pet projects belong
further down – secondary to the Divine Project, the one mission we
all share here as a team, as the family and people of God.
Our
houses may be nice, there may be many good things we do – but woe
if we persistently put them ahead of God's house for all nations, the
house where mission happens, the roving dwelling where Jesus touches
lives. Woe if, for the sake of our paneled houses, we neglect the
temple of the LORD.
Woe if we don't have “a mind to work.”
Nehemiah's
generation remembered Haggai's words. They learned his lesson. They
were neither slothful nor self-serving. When Nehemiah said they had
“a mind to work,” he spelled out for us what he meant. He didn't
mean that each of them was enthusiastically working on his or her own
house. He meant that the whole people “committed themselves to the
common good” (Nehemiah 2:18).
Those are his own words! They
“committed themselves to the common good.” Their hands weren't
busied with their own individual personal projects, things that
benefited only themselves and their own families. They didn't leave
the temple, or later the synagogue, telling everybody else, “See
you next Sabbath!” Their lives in between sabbath days weren't an
untold, unshared mystery to those who worshipped to their right or
left. They didn't neglect their own houses, but they knew how
important it was that they worked together on something that would
benefit everyone, not just their own family.
Before
this morning ends, we're going to be holding our annual
congregational meeting. Think of it like Nehemiah's survey. We're
going to assess our church. We're going to reflect on where we've
been this past year. But most important of all, I hope we look
ahead. I hope we jump-start a collective brainstorm. What do we need
to be effective, as a church, in bringing the kingdom of God, the
active presence of Jesus, to our slice of Lancaster and Chester
Counties? Where do they need the gifts God has already sown among
us? Where, when, and how will we let the Spirit of Jesus carry us
into an encounter with those who need him?
Those are the questions
we need to take up. But the final question that rests before us: Do
we have “a mind to work,” a commitment to the common good? Do we
have “a mind to work” on God's mission, to serve him as
Pequea EC from Monday to Saturday as well as on Sunday? God invites
us to choose, and to make our choice known by how we live, and not
just what we say.
I believe with all my heart that there is
a future God wants to give to Pequea EC, and it is not about
shriveling, it is not about the status quo. I believe that we can
do effective ministry here where we are. But it will require “a
mind to work.” May we choose as Nehemiah's Jerusalem chose. Amen.